What (Exactly) Is Thematic Analysis?
A Plain-Language Explanation & Definition (With Examples)
By: Jenna Crosley (Phd Cand). Expert Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | April 2021
Thematic analysis is one of the most popular qualitative analysis techniques we see here at Grad Coach – and for good reason. Qualitative thematic analysis can be a very powerful analysis technique when used correctly. In this post, we’ll break thematic analysis down using plain language so that you can conquer your analysis with confidence.
Thematic Analysis 101
In this post, we’ll explain in plain, straightforward language:
First, the lingo…
Before we begin, let’s first lay down some terminology. In thematic analysis, you’ll make use of codes. A code is a label assigned to a piece of text, and the aim of using a code is to identify and summarise important concepts within a set of data, such as an interview transcript.
For example, if you had the sentence, “My rabbit ate my shoes”, you could use the codes rabbit or shoes to highlight these two concepts. The process of assigning codes is called coding, where you categorise data in a way that allows you to derive themes and patterns. If this is a new concept to you, be sure to check out our detailed post about qualitative coding.
Codes are vital as they are a foundation for themes. But what exactly is a theme? A theme is a pattern that can be identified within a data set. In other words, it’s a topic or concept that pops up repeatedly throughout your data. Grouping your codes into themes serves as a way of summarising sections of your data in a useful way that helps you answer your research question(s) and achieve your research aim(s) and objective(s).
With that basic terminology out of the way, let’s jump into the wonderful world of thematic analysis…
What is thematic analysis?
Thematic analysis is the study of patterns of meaning. In other words, it’s about analysing the themes within your data set to identify meaning. Most importantly, this process is driven by your research questions, so it’s not necessary to identify every possible theme in the data, but rather to focus on the key aspects that relate to your research questions.
Although you’ll begin your study with research questions, it’s important to remember that these questions are not necessarily fixed. As thematic analysis tends to be a bit of an exploratory process, research questions can evolve as you progress with your coding and theme identification.
When should you use thematic analysis?
There are several ways that you can analyse a set of data. For example, by using content analysis, discourse analysis, or narrative analysis. So why use thematic analysis?
When working with large bodies of data, thematic analysis is highly beneficial as it allows you to divide and categorise large amounts of data in a way that makes it far easier to digest. Thematic analysis is particularly useful when looking for subjective information such as a participant’s experiences, views, and opinions, which is why it is usually conducted on data derived from, for example, surveys, social media posts, interviews, and conversations.
Your research questions can also give you an idea of whether you should use thematic analysis or not. For example, if your research questions were to be along the lines of:
- How do dog walkers perceive rules and regulations on dog-friendly beaches?
- What are students’ experiences with the shift to online learning?
- What opinions do health professionals hold about the Hippocratic code?
- How is gender constructed in a high school classroom setting?
These examples are all research questions centering on the subjective experiences of participants and aim to assess experiences, views, and opinions, and thus thematic analysis is a possible approach.
In short, thematic analysis is a good choice when you are wanting to categorise large bodies of data (although the data doesn’t necessarily have to be large), and particularly when you are interested in subjective experiences.
What are the main approaches?
There are several overarching approaches to thematic analysis. The approach you take will depend on what is most suitable for your research design, and it is possible to take more than one approach. Let’s have a look at the main approaches to thematic analysis.
The inductive approach
The inductive approach involves deriving meaning and creating themes from data without any preconceptions. In other words, you’d dive into your analysis without an idea of what themes will emerge, and thus allow themes to be determined by the data – to emerge from the data.
For example, if you’re investigating typical lunchtime conversational topics in a university faculty, you’d enter the research without any preconceived themes or expected outcomes. You may have thoughts about what might be discussed (e.g., academic matters because it’s an academic setting), but these cannot be noted as themes ahead of analysing your data.
The deductive approach
In contrast to the inductive approach, a deductive approach involves jumping into your analysis with a set of themes that you already expect to find in your data. Usually, this approach is informed by prior knowledge and/or research and/or existing theory (which you’d cover in your literature review).
For example, if you’re analysing a set of student essays on the topic of the cold war, you’d be able to draw themes such as “tension” or “alliance”, based on prior research into the topic.
The semantic approach
The semantic approach ignores the underlying meaning of data, and identify themes based only on what is explicitly or overtly stated or written – in other words, things are taken at face value. Typically, this approach is taken when investigating opinions and viewpoints, as these tend to be explicit.
The latent approach
In contrast to a semantic approach, a latent approach focuses on underlying meanings and rather looks at the reasons for semantic content. Furthermore, in contrast to the semantic approach, a latent approach involves an element of interpretation, where data is not just taken at face value, but meanings are also theorised.
“But how do I know when to use what approach?”, I hear you ask.
Well, this all depends on the type of data you’re analysing and what you’re trying to achieve with your analysis. For example, if you’re aiming to analyse explicit opinions expressed in interviews and you know what you’re looking for ahead of time (i.e., you’re able to draw up a list of codes before beginning your analysis rather than creating these as you go along), you may choose to combine deductive and semantic approaches.
On the other hand, if you’re looking to explore the underlying meaning expressed by participants in a focus group, and you don’t have a predetermined set of codes, you’ll likely choose a combination of the inductive and latent approach.
In other words, the nature and focus of your research, especially your research aims, objective and questions will directly inform the approach you take to thematic analysis.
What are the types of thematic analysis?
Now that you’ve got an understanding of the overarching approaches to thematic analysis, it’s time to have a look at the different types of thematic analysis you can conduct. There are three types of thematic analysis:
- Coding reliability thematic analysis
- Codebook thematic analysis
- Reflexive thematic analysis
Let’s have a look at each of these:
Reflexive thematic analysis does not make use of a codebook (a detailed set of code descriptions), and is the most flexible of the three analysis types. With this type of thematic analysis, researchers can change, remove, and add codes as they work through the data. Reflexive thematic analysis can be performed by multiple researchers but can also be an individual effort. When more than one researcher takes part in the coding process, this is more of a collaborative process, where researchers do not necessarily have to decide on a consensus, rather compiling codes based on all the coders’ individual findings.
While reliability thematic analysis and codebook thematic analysis typically involves developing codes before/at the start of the analysis process, reflexive thematic analysis usually involves creating these at a later stage of the analysis, which is typical of inductive coding.
Coding reliability thematic analysis necessitates the work of multiple coders, and the design is specifically intended for research teams. With this type of analysis, codebooks are typically fixed and are rarely altered, except in cases where the codes do not match the data.
The benefit of this form of analysis is that it brings an element of intercoder reliability where coders need to agree upon the codes used, which means that the outcome is more rigorous as the element of subjectivity is reduced. In other words, multiple coders discuss which codes should be used and which shouldn’t, and this consensus reduces the bias of having one individual coder decide upon themes.
Codebook thematic analysis makes use of structured codebooks and predetermined codes, and so it is typically conducted from a deductive perspective. These codes are typically drawn from a review of the data (or even an initial analysis), and only then are codebooks produced. Codebook thematic analysis often adopts a deductive coding approach, where a codebook can be created by one or more researcher.
Quick Recap: Thematic analysis approaches and types
To recap, the four main approaches to thematic analysis are inductive, deductive, semantic, and latent approaches. Then we have the three types of thematic analysis: reflexive thematic analysis, coding reliability thematic analysis, and codebook thematic analysis. Your choice of the type of thematic analysis to conduct will depend on factors such as:
- The approach you are taking. For example, if you are using an inductive approach you may use reflexive thematic analysis due to its inductive properties.
- Whether you’re working alone or in a group. It’s likely that, if you’re doing research as part of your postgraduate studies (e.g. a dissertation or thesis), you’ll likely be working alone, which means that you wouldn’t make use of coding reliability thematic analysis as it involves multiple researchers.
Now that you’ve got clarity on the thematic analysis approaches and types, it’s time to look at the “how” of thematic analysis.
How to “do” thematic analysisAt this point, you’re ready to get going with your analysis, so let’s dive right into the thematic analysis process. Keep in mind that what we’ll cover here is a generic process, and the relevant steps will vary depending on your approach and type of thematic analysis.
Step 2! You’re going strong. In this step, you’ll want to look out for patterns or themes in your codes. Moving from codes to themes is not necessarily a smooth or linear process. As you become more and more familiar with the data, you may find that you need to assign different codes or themes according to what new elements you find. For example, if you were analysing a text talking about wildlife, you may come across the codes, “pigeon”, “canary” and “budgerigar” which can fall under the theme of birds.
As you work through the data, you may start to identify subthemes, which are subdivisions of themes that focus specifically on an aspect within the theme that is significant or relevant to your research question. For example, if your theme is a university, your subthemes could be faculties or departments at that university.
In this stage of the analysis, your reflexivity journal entries need to reflect how codes were interpreted and combined to form themes.
By now you’ll have a good idea of your codes, themes, and potentially subthemes. Now it’s time to review all the themes you’ve identified. In this step, you’ll want to check that everything you’ve categorised as a theme actually fits the data, whether the themes do indeed exist in the data, whether there are any themes missing, and whether you can move on to the next step knowing that you’ve coded all your themes accurately and comprehensively. If you find that your themes have become too broad and there is far too much information under one theme, it may be useful to split this into more themes so that you’re able to be more specific with your analysis.
In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write about how you understood the themes and how they are supported by evidence, as well as how the themes fit in with your codes. At this point, you’ll also want to revisit your research questions and make sure that the data and themes you’ve identified are directly relevant to these questions.
By this point, your analysis will really start to take shape. In the previous step, you reviewed and refined your themes, and now it’s time to label and finalise them. It’s important to note here that, just because you’ve moved onto the next step, it doesn’t mean that you can’t go back and revise or rework your themes. In contrast to the previous step, finalising your themes means spelling out what exactly the themes consist of, and describe them in detail. If you struggle with this, you may want to return to your data to make sure that your data and coding do represent the themes, and if you need to divide your themes into more themes (i.e., return to step 3).
When you name your themes, make sure that you select labels that accurately encapsulate the properties of the theme. For example, a theme name such as “enthusiasm in professionals” leaves the question of “who are the professionals?”, so you’d want to be more specific and label the theme as something along the lines of “enthusiasm in healthcare professionals”.
It is very important at this stage that you make sure that your themes align with your research questions. When you’re finalising your themes, you’re also nearing the end of your analysis and need to keep in mind that your final report (discussed in the next step) will need to fit in with the aims and objectives of your research.
In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write down a few sentences describing your themes and how you decided on these. Here, you’ll also want to mention how the theme will contribute to the outcomes of your research, and also what it means in relation to your research questions and focus of your research.
By the end of this stage, you’ll be done with your themes – meaning it’s time to write up your findings and produce a report.
You’re nearly done! Now that you’ve analysed your data, it’s time to report on your findings. A typical thematic analysis report consists of:
- An introduction
- A methodology section
- Your results and findings
- A conclusion
When writing your report, make sure that you provide enough information for a reader to be able to evaluate the rigour of your analysis. In other words, the reader needs to know the exact process you followed when analysing your data and why. The questions of “what”, “how”, “why”, “who”, and “when” may be useful in this section.
So, what did you investigate? How did you investigate it? Why did you choose this particular method? Who does your research focus on, and who are your participants? When did you conduct your research, when did you collect your data, and when was the data produced? Your reflexivity journal will come in handy here as within it you’ve already labelled, described, and supported your themes.
If you’re undertaking a thematic analysis as part of a dissertation or thesis, this discussion will be split across your methodology, results and discussion chapters. For more information about those chapters, check out our detailed video and blog post about dissertation structure.
It’s absolutely vital that, when writing up your results, you back up every single one of your findings with quotations. The reader needs to be able to see that what you’re reporting actually exists within the results. Also make sure that, when reporting your findings, you tie them back to your research questions. You don’t want your reader to be looking through your findings and asking, “So what?”, so make sure that every finding you represent is relevant to your research topic and questions.
Recap: How to “do” thematic analysis
I’ve thrown a lot at you here. Let’s quickly recap the key steps for thematic analysis:
Getting familiar with your data: Here you’ll read through your data and get a general overview of what you’re working with. At this stage, you may identify a few general codes and themes that you’ll make use of in the next step.
Search for patterns or themes in your codes: Here you’ll dive into your data and pick out the themes and codes relevant to your research question(s).
Review themes: In this step, you’ll revisit your codes and themes to make sure that they are all truly representative of the data, and that you can use them in your final report.
Finalise themes: Here’s where you “solidify” your analysis and make it report-ready by describing and defining your themes.
Produce your report: This is the final step of your thematic analysis process, where you put everything you’ve found together and report on your findings.
In this article, we’ve covered the basics of thematic analysis – what it is, when to use it, the different approaches and types of thematic analysis, and how to perform a thematic analysis.
If you have any questions about thematic analysis, drop a comment below and we’ll do our best to assist. If you’d like 1-on-1 support with your thematic analysis, be sure to check out our research coaching services here.