Skip to content
Grad Coach

Diagram · CC BY 4.0

Self-determination theory example: the motivation continuum

Six regulatory styles from amotivation to intrinsic motivation, each with a homework example.

The self-determination continuum of self-determination theory, after Ryan and Deci (2000b), Figure 1. Six regulatory styles run from left to right along a plain axis, from nonself-determined to self-determined. Non-regulation corresponds to amotivation. External, introjected, identified and integrated regulation are the four types of extrinsic motivation and are bracketed together. Intrinsic regulation corresponds to intrinsic motivation.

Swipe sideways to see the whole diagram, or download the PNG.

Self-determination theory - motivation continuum. Derek Jansen, Grad Coach, CC BY 4.0.

The three basic psychological needs

Autonomy, competence and relatedness: when satisfied they lead to enhanced self-motivation and mental health, and when thwarted to diminished motivation and well-being (Ryan and Deci 2000b).

The three basic psychological needs of self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci 2000b). Autonomy is feeling able to choose one's own actions, competence is feeling effective in what one does, and relatedness is feeling belonging and connection with others. A bracket groups the three needs. One arrow leads from it, when the needs are satisfied, to enhanced self-motivation and mental health; a second leads, when they are thwarted, to diminished motivation and well-being. Both outcomes are worded as in the paper's abstract.

Swipe sideways to see the whole diagram, or download the PNG.

Self-determination theory - basic psychological needs. Derek Jansen, Grad Coach, CC BY 4.0.

"Self-determination theory - basic psychological needs" by Derek Jansen, Grad Coach (https://gradcoach.com/open-educational-resources/self-determination-theory-example/) is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Cite it (APA 7):Jansen, D. (2026). Self-determination theory - basic psychological needs [Diagram]. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34701909

What it shows

The self-determination continuum from Ryan and Deci (2000b). Six regulatory styles run from nonself-determined to self-determined: non-regulation (amotivation), the four types of extrinsic motivation (external, introjected, identified and integrated regulation) and intrinsic regulation.

Each style carries a one-line description and one student’s reason for doing homework, from just going through the motions to doing it out of curiosity and interest. Three reasons (parental sanctions, a chosen career, curiosity and interest) are Ryan and Deci’s own homework examples; the rest are condensed from their definitions.

How to read it

  1. Read left to right: the further right, the more the motivation comes from the self.

  2. The bracket over the middle four marks them all as extrinsic: the homework is done for a separable outcome, even when the student values it.

  3. The orange line in each box is the same student’s reason at that point.

  4. Ryan and Deci state that this is not a developmental sequence: a person can adopt a new regulation at any point along it.

The six styles

  • Non-regulation (amotivation): no intention to act. Just goes through the motions.
  • External regulation: acts for a reward or to avoid punishment. Fears trouble with parents.
  • Introjected regulation: acts to avoid guilt or to feel pride. Would feel guilty not doing it.
  • Identified regulation: consciously values the activity. Sees its value for a chosen career.
  • Integrated regulation: the value is fully part of the self. Fits their other goals and values.
  • Intrinsic regulation: acts for the inherent satisfaction. Out of curiosity and interest.

Ways to use it in teaching

  • Students place their own reasons for taking your course on the continuum, anonymously, and discuss the spread.

  • In a questionnaire design session, each style becomes a subscale with its own items.

  • Ask what a teacher could change to move a reason one step to the right.

To see how a theory like this becomes the framework of a study, read our theoretical framework examples.

Sources

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Behavior and motivation theories

Related diagrams

All open educational resources

Need something else?

Tell us which diagram, template or worked examples would help your teaching, and we’ll do our best to add it to the collection.